Marcus Listeria
A white paper is an influential persuasive essay that makes use of precise logic and facts to advocate for a particular viewpoint, product, or belief. Beyond that, most people have heard of a white paper classified as: A short manifesto on how best to resolve a specific issue. It usually describes a problem in the field of social science or economics and seeks to explain why a solution is preferred over a possible alternative. For instance, if a social scientist wishes to prove that discrimination is widespread in the workplace, he/she might write a white paper that examines the reasons why discrimination occurs.
Writing a review is very similar to writing a paper. In both cases, you are presenting your own viewpoint of an issue, drawing on various facts, and researching the literature to support it. When writing a white paper, you will be looking to support your claim with precise research and cite sources that support your claim. The purpose of a white paper review is to determine if the paper is worthy of being published.
As I stated above, there are many reasons why you would want to write a review on a white paper. One reason is to make sure that the paper is not merely an opinion. Most reviews are done by one person who reads the paper with unbiased intent. However, it’s important that the reviewer is able to tell whether the white paper has merit, since many a time the reviewer is hired to ‘write the review’ and not actually read the entire work.
When conducting a review, you must take into account a number of factors. First, you must determine if the white paper is indeed a whitewash. It may be written by a number of experts in their own field, but the purpose is to support a particular viewpoint. For instance, if an economic fact is cited in support of a labor law claim, but the facts are from a competitor’s blog, the review is essentially worthless. The facts from the blog should be used to justify the employer’s position on the law.
In addition, you must analyze the facts provided within the paper. You have to find if there are any facts that can reasonably be considered controversial. Typically a review will find a number of factual errors in the paper, such as claims that were grossly overstated, or data that was misrepresented. While these mistakes may seem small, they could greatly affect the results the paper achieves. If these mistakes are found, the paper should be changed or edited, and the author should pay the authors whose data was wrong.
Finally, you must look at whether the white paper has a unique structure. While all are free to write, some have better structure, which allows for a better review. As an example, if the paper has a detailed introduction, the author should include the key points in an easily readable manner. If the paper has several different parts, each section should contain a different section of the main body, making it easy to follow. All of this can help to ensure that a high-quality paper is created and that it is reviewed properly by others.
